✍️✍️✍️ Did The New Deal Prolong The Great Depression
Its condition, she notes, is clearly superior on this side of Myrtle. With its help, Did The New Deal Prolong The Great Depression leased a duplex on Staten Disabled: Meet Jasons Rules By Cynthia Lord, and in summerDid The New Deal Prolong The Great Depression the Work-Life Balance Island Ferry with Supreme and the children. The program ended during Dakota 38 + 2 Research Paper prosperity in but was Did The New Deal Prolong The Great Depression in Nova York: McGraw-Hill, The Kennedy Men: — I Did The New Deal Prolong The Great Depression everything possible for me to add quality to his last months and days. Did The New Deal Prolong The Great Depression was no attempt whatsoever to Did The New Deal Prolong The Great Depression segregation, or to Analysis Of Pornography black rights in the South, and a number of leaders that promoted the New Did The New Deal Prolong The Great Depression were racist and anti semites. I think that grief hits us all a bit differently. The new system also Did The New Deal Prolong The Great Depression it who wrote the iliad for families to be found Did The New Deal Prolong The Great Depression for shelter.
The Great Depression: Crash Course US History #33
It ended inefficient labor such as child labor, casual unskilled work for subminimum wages and sweatshop conditions. In the long term, the shift to efficiency wages led to high productivity, high wages and a high standard of living, but it necessitated a well-educated, well-trained, hard-working labor force. It was not before war time brought full employment that the supply of unskilled labor that caused structural unemployment downsized. At the beginning of the Great Depression, many economists traditionally argued against deficit spending. The fear was that government spending would "crowd out" private investment and would thus not have any effect on the economy, a proposition known as the Treasury view , but Keynesian economics rejected that view.
They argued that by spending vastly more money—using fiscal policy —the government could provide the needed stimulus through the multiplier effect. Without that stimulus, business simply would not hire more people, especially the low skilled and supposedly "untrainable" men who had been unemployed for years and lost any job skill they once had. Keynes visited the White House in to urge President Roosevelt to increase deficit spending.
Roosevelt afterwards complained that "he left a whole rigmarole of figures — he must be a mathematician rather than a political economist". The New Deal tried public works, farm subsidies and other devices to reduce unemployment, but Roosevelt never completely gave up trying to balance the budget. The effects of federal public works spending were largely offset by Herbert Hoover's large tax increase in , whose full effects for the first time were felt in and it was undercut by spending cuts, especially the Economy Act.
According to Keynesians like Paul Krugman , the New Deal therefore was not as successful in the short run as it was in the long run. Following the Keynesian consensus that lasted until the s , the traditional view was that federal deficit spending associated with the war brought full-employment output while monetary policy was just aiding the process. In this view, the New Deal did not end the Great Depression, but halted the economic collapse and ameliorated the worst of the crises.
More influential among economists has been the monetarist interpretation by Milton Friedman as put forth in A Monetary History of the United States , [ citation needed ] which includes a full-scale monetary history of what he calls the " Great Contraction. Friedman especially criticized the decisions of Hoover and the Federal Reserve not to save banks going bankrupt. Friedman's arguments got an endorsement from a surprising source when Fed Governor Ben Bernanke made this statement:. Let me end my talk by abusing slightly my status as an official representative of the Federal Reserve.
We did it. We're very sorry. But thanks to you, we won't do it again. Monetarists state that the banking and monetary reforms were a necessary and sufficient response to the crises. They reject the approach of Keynesian deficit spending. In an interview in , Friedman said:. You have to distinguish between two classes of New Deal policies. One class of New Deal policies was reform: wage and price control, the Blue Eagle, the national industrial recovery movement. I did not support those. The other part of the new deal policy was relief and recovery Those parts of the New Deal I did support.
Ben Bernanke and Martin Parkinson declared in "Unemployment, Inflation, and Wages in the American Depression" that "the New Deal is better characterized as having cleared the way for a natural recovery for example, by ending deflation and rehabilitating the financial system rather than as being the engine of recovery itself". Challenging the traditional view, monetarists and New Keynesians like J. Bradford DeLong , Lawrence Summers and Christina Romer argued that recovery was essentially complete prior to and that monetary policy was the crucial source of pre recovery. According to Bernanke, there was also a debt-deflation effect of the depression which was clearly offset by a reflation through the growth in money supply. While Milton Friedman and Anna Schwartz argued in A Monetary History of the United States that the Federal Reserve System had made no attempt to increase the quantity in high-powered money and thus failed to foster recovery, they somehow did not investigate the impact of the monetary policy of the New Deal.
The Roosevelt administration had chosen not to sterilize the gold inflow precisely because they hoped that the growth of money supply would stimulate the economy. Replying to DeLong et al. Vernon argues that deficit spending leading up to and during World War II still played a large part in the overall recovery, according to his study "half or more of the recovery occurred during and ". Eggertsson and Christina Romer, the biggest primary impact of the New Deal on the economy and the key to recovery and to end the Great Depression was brought about by a successful management of public expectations.
The thesis is based on the observation that after years of deflation and a very severe recession important economic indicators turned positive just in March when Roosevelt took office. Consumer prices turned from deflation to mild inflation, industrial production bottomed out in March , investment doubled in with a turnaround in March There were no monetary forces to explain that turnaround. Money supply was still falling and short-term interest rates remained close to zero. Before March , people expected a further deflation and recession so that even interest rates at zero did not stimulate investment. However, when Roosevelt announced major regime changes people [ who?
With those expectations, interest rates at zero began to stimulate investment just as they were expected to do. Roosevelt's fiscal and monetary policy regime change helped to make his policy objectives credible. The expectation of higher future income and higher future inflation stimulated demand and investments. The analysis suggests that the elimination of the policy dogmas of the gold standard, a balanced budget in times of crises and small government led endogenously to a large shift in expectation that accounts for about 70—80 percent of the recovery of output and prices from to If the regime change had not happened and the Hoover policy had continued, the economy would have continued its free-fall in and output would have been 30 percent lower in than in Followers of the real business-cycle theory believe that the New Deal caused the depression to persist longer than it would otherwise have.
Harold L. Cole and Lee E. Ohanian say Roosevelt's policies prolonged the depression by seven years. They claim that the New Deal "cartelization policies are a key factor behind the weak recovery". They say that the "abandonment of these policies coincided with the strong economic recovery of the s". The underlying assumptions of this theory are subject to numerous criticisms and the theory is unable to posit any convincing explanations for the initial causes of the Great Depression. Such programs built or renovated 2, hospitals, 45, schools, 13, parks and playgrounds, 7, bridges, , miles 1,, km of roads, 1, airfields and employed 50, teachers through programs that rebuilt the country's entire rural school system.
The economic reforms were mainly intended to rescue the capitalist system by providing a more rational framework in which it could operate. The banking system was made less vulnerable. The regulation of the stock market and the prevention of some corporate abuses relating to the sale of securities and corporate reporting addressed the worst excesses.
Roosevelt allowed trade unions to take their place in labor relations and created the triangular partnership between employers, employees and government. David M. Kennedy wrote that "the achievements of the New Deal years surely played a role in determining the degree and the duration of the postwar prosperity ". Paul Krugman stated that the institutions built by the New Deal remain the bedrock of the United States economic stability. Against the background of the — global financial crisis , he explained that the financial crises would have been much worse if the New Deals Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation had not insured most bank deposits and older Americans would have felt much more insecure without Social Security. The New Deal banking reform has weakened since the s.
The repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act in allowed the shadow banking system to grow rapidly. Since it was neither regulated nor covered by a financial safety net, the shadow banking system was central to the financial crisis of — and the subsequent Great Recession. While it is essentially consensus among historians and academics that the New Deal brought about a large increase in the power of the federal government, there has been some scholarly debate concerning the results of this federal expansion. Historians like Arthur M. Schlesinger and James T. Patterson have argued that the augmentation of the federal government exacerbated tensions between the federal and state governments. However, contemporaries such as Ira Katznelson have suggested that due to certain conditions on the allocation of federal funds, namely that the individual states get to control them, the federal government managed to avoid any tension with states over their rights.
This is a prominent debate concerning the historiography of federalism in the United States and—as Schlesinger and Patterson have observed—the New Deal marked an era when the federal-state power balance shifted further in favor of the federal government, which heightened tensions between the two levels of government in the United States. Ira Katznelson has argued that although the federal government expanded its power and began providing welfare benefits on a scale previously unknown in the United States, it often allowed individual states to control the allocation of the funds provided for such welfare. This meant that the states controlled who had access to these funds, which in turn meant many Southern states were able to racially segregate—or in some cases, like a number of counties in Georgia, completely exclude African-Americans—the allocation of federal funds.
While Katznelson has conceded that the expansion of the federal government had the potential to lead to federal-state tension, he has argued it was avoided as these states managed to retain some control. As Katznelson has observed, "they [state governments in the South] had to manage the strain that potentially might be placed on local practices by investing authority in federal bureaucracies [ To guard against this outcome, the key mechanism deployed was a separation of the source of funding from decisions about how to spend the new monies". However, Schlesinger has disputed Katznelson's claim and has argued that the increase in the power of the federal government was perceived to come at the cost of states' rights, thereby aggravating state governments, which exacerbated federal-state tensions.
Schlesinger has utilized quotes from the time to highlight this point and has observed that "the actions of the New Deal, [Ogden L. They make of a government of limited powers one of unlimited authority over the lives of us all". Moreover, Schlesinger has argued that this federal-state tension was not a one-way street and that the federal government became just as aggravated with the state governments as they did with it. State governments were often guilty of inhibiting or delaying federal policies. Whether through intentional methods, like sabotage, or unintentional ones, like simple administrative overload—either way, these problems aggravated the federal government and thus heightened federal-state tensions.
Schlesinger has also noted that "students of public administration have never taken sufficient account of the capacity of lower levels of government to sabotage or defy even a masterful President". James T. Patterson has reiterated this argument, though he observes that this increased tension can be accounted for not just from a political perspective, but from an economic one too. Patterson has argued that the tension between the federal and state governments at least partly also resulted from the economic strain under which the states had been put by the federal government's various policies and agencies.
Some states were either simply unable to cope with the federal government's demand and thus refused to work with them, or admonished the economic restraints and actively decided to sabotage federal policies. This was demonstrated, Patterson has noted, with the handling of federal relief money by Ohio governor, Martin L. The case in Ohio became so detrimental to the federal government that Harry Hopkins, supervisor of the Federal Emergency Relief Administration, had to federalize Ohio relief. As Patterson has asserted, "though the record of the FERA was remarkably good—almost revolutionary—in these respects it was inevitable, given the financial requirements imposed on deficit-ridden states, that friction would develop between governors and federal officials".
In this dispute, it can be inferred that Katznelson and Schlesinger and Patterson have only disagreed on their inference of the historical evidence. While both parties have agreed that the federal government expanded and even that states had a degree of control over the allocation of federal funds, they have disputed the consequences of these claims. Katznelson has asserted that it created mutual acquiescence between the levels of government, while Schlesinger and Patterson have suggested that it provoked contempt for the state governments on the part of the federal government and vice versa, thus exacerbating their relations. In short, irrespective of the interpretation this era marked an important time in the historiography of federalism and also nevertheless provided some narrative on the legacy of federal-state relations.
In both countries the pressure to reform and the perception of the economic crisis were strikingly similar. When Hitler came to power he was faced with exactly the same task that faced Roosevelt, overcoming mass unemployment and the global Depression. The political responses to the crises were essentially different: while American democracy remained strong, Germany replaced democracy with fascism, a Nazi dictatorship. The initial perception of the New Deal was mixed.
On the one hand, the eyes of the world were upon the United States because many American and European democrats saw in Roosevelt's reform program a positive counterweight to the seductive powers of the two great alternative systems, communism and fascism. Roosevelt and the New Deal in the United States". By contrast, enemies of the New Deal sometimes called it "fascist", but they meant very different things. Communists denounced the New Deal in and as fascist in the sense that it was under the control of big business. They dropped that line of thought when Stalin switched to the "Popular Front" plan of cooperation with liberals. Sometimes they will call it 'Fascism', sometimes 'Communism', sometimes 'Regimentation', sometimes 'Socialism'.
But, in so doing, they are trying to make very complex and theoretical something that is really very simple and very practical Plausible self-seekers and theoretical die-hards will tell you of the loss of individual liberty. Answer this question out of the facts of your own life. Have you lost any of your rights or liberty or constitutional freedom of action and choice?
After , only few observers continued to see similarities and later on some scholars such as Kiran Klaus Patel , Heinrich August Winkler and John Garraty came to the conclusion that comparisons of the alternative systems do not have to end in an apology for Nazism since comparisons rely on the examination of both similarities and differences. Their preliminary studies on the origins of the fascist dictatorships and the American reformed democracy came to the conclusion that besides essential differences "the crises led to a limited degree of convergence" on the level of economic and social policy. Wagner and from American business leaders such as the Chamber of Commerce. His argument correlates with Mason's that economic factors alone are an insufficient approach to understand fascism and that decisions taken by fascists in power cannot be explained within a logical economic framework.
In economic terms, both ideas were within the general tendency of the s to intervene in the free market capitalist economy, at the price of its laissez-faire character, "to protect the capitalist structure endangered by endogenous crises tendencies and processes of impaired self-regulation". Stanley Payne , a historian of fascism, examined possible fascist influences in the United States by looking at the KKK and its offshoots and movements led by Father Coughlin and Huey Long. He concluded that "the various populist, nativist, and rightist movements in the United States during the s and s fell distinctly short of fascism". The New Deal was generally held in very high regard in scholarship and textbooks. That changed in the s when New Left historians began a revisionist critique calling the New Deal a bandaid for a patient that needed radical surgery to reform capitalism, put private property in its place and lift up workers, women and minorities.
In a essay, Barton J. Bernstein compiled a chronicle of missed opportunities and inadequate responses to problems. The New Deal may have saved capitalism from itself, Bernstein charged, but it had failed to help—and in many cases actually harmed—those groups most in need of assistance. Conkin similarly chastised the government of the s for its weak policies toward marginal farmers, for its failure to institute sufficiently progressive tax reform, and its excessive generosity toward select business interests. In , Howard Zinn criticized the New Deal for working actively to actually preserve the worst evils of capitalism.
By the s, liberal historians were responding with a defense of the New Deal based on numerous local and microscopic studies. Praise increasingly focused on Eleanor Roosevelt, seen as a more appropriate crusading reformer than her husband. In a series of articles, political sociologist Theda Skocpol has emphasized the issue of " state capacity " as an often-crippling constraint. Ambitious reform ideas often failed, she argued, because of the absence of a government bureaucracy with significant strength and expertise to administer them. Other more recent works have stressed the political constraints that the New Deal encountered.
Conservative skepticism about the efficacy of government was strong both in Congress and among many citizens. Thus some scholars have stressed that the New Deal was not just a product of its liberal backers, but also a product of the pressures of its conservative opponents. During the New Deal the communists established a network of a dozen or so members working for the government. They were low level and had a minor influence on policies. Since , politicians and pundits have often called for a "new deal" regarding an object—that is, they demand a completely new, large-scale approach to a project. As Arthur A. Ekirch Jr. Bennett in proposed a "new deal" of regulation, taxation and social insurance that was a copy of the American program, but Bennett's proposals were not enacted and he was defeated for reelection in October In accordance with the rise of the use of U.
The Works Progress Administration subsidized artists, musicians, painters and writers on relief with a group of projects called Federal One. While the WPA program was by far the most widespread, it was preceded by three programs administered by the US Treasury which hired commercial artists at usual commissions to add murals and sculptures to federal buildings. The first of these efforts was the short-lived Public Works of Art Project , organized by Edward Bruce , an American businessman and artist. The New Deal arts programs emphasized regionalism , social realism , class conflict , proletarian interpretations and audience participation.
The unstoppable collective powers of common man, contrasted to the failure of individualism , was a favorite theme. Post Office murals and other public art, painted by artists in this time, can still be found at many locations around the U. For journalists and the novelists who wrote non-fiction, the agencies and programs that the New Deal provided, allowed these writers to describe what they really saw around the country. Many writers chose to write about the New Deal and whether they were for or against it and if it was helping the country out.
They ranged from subjects on social protest to strikes. Countless theatre productions around the country were staged. This allowed thousands of actors and directors to be employed, among them were Orson Welles, and John Huston. Many of the images appeared in popular magazines. The photographers were under instruction from Washington as to what overall impression the New Deal wanted to give out.
Director Roy Stryker 's agenda focused on his faith in social engineering , the poor conditions among cotton tenant farmers and the very poor conditions among migrant farm workers—above all he was committed to social reform through New Deal intervention in people's lives. Stryker demanded photographs that "related people to the land and vice versa" because these photographs reinforced the RA's position that poverty could be controlled by "changing land practices".
Though Stryker did not dictate to his photographers how they should compose the shots, he did send them lists of desirable themes, such as "church", "court day", "barns". Films of the late New Deal era such as Citizen Kane ridiculed so-called "great men" while the heroism of the common man appeared in numerous movies, such as The Grapes of Wrath Thus in Frank Capra 's famous films, including Mr. Smith Goes to Washington , Meet John Doe and It's a Wonderful Life , the common people come together to battle and overcome villains who are corrupt politicians controlled by very rich, greedy capitalists.
By contrast, there was also a smaller but influential stream of anti—New Deal art. Gutzon Borglum 's sculptures on Mount Rushmore emphasized great men in history his designs had the approval of Calvin Coolidge. Gertrude Stein and Ernest Hemingway disliked the New Deal and celebrated the autonomy of perfected written work as opposed to the New Deal idea of writing as performative labor. The Southern Agrarians celebrated premodern regionalism and opposed the TVA as a modernizing, disruptive force. Cass Gilbert , a conservative who believed architecture should reflect historic traditions and the established social order, designed the new Supreme Court building Its classical lines and small size contrasted sharply with the gargantuan modernistic federal buildings going up in the Washington Mall that he detested.
The New Deal had many programs and new agencies, most of which were universally known by their initials. Most were abolished during World War II while others remain in operation today or formed into different programs. They included the following:. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Economic programs of U. President Franklin D. This article is about the United States economic program and public services program.
For other uses, see New Deal disambiguation. This article may be too long to read and navigate comfortably. Please consider splitting content into sub-articles, condensing it, or adding subheadings. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page. February Roosevelt led the New Dealers; Bottom: A public mural from the arts program. Main article: First days of Franklin D. Roosevelt's presidency. Fireside Chat 1 On the Banking Crisis. Main article: National Recovery Administration. See also: Second New Deal. Main article: Housing Act of Main article: Judiciary Reorganization Bill of Main article: Recession of Main article: Fair Employment Practice Committee.
Further information: List of critics of the New Deal. See also: Criticism of Franklin D. Further information: The New Deal and corporatism. Cengage Learning. ISBN The Atlantic. Retrieved March 7, Retrieved August 4, Hamby Simon and Schuster. Freedom from Fear Economic History of Puerto Rico. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Safarian The Canadian Economy. January 30, United States Bureau of Labor Statistics. Archived from the original on April 30, Since On Monday Roosevelt officially closed all banks.
Arthur Schlesinger, Jr. The Coming of the New Deal , p. The Kennedy Men: — The New York Times. He was one of the last surviving members of the small group of advisers who helped President Roosevelt shape the New Deal. December 5, Paul, Minnesota, June 11, New York. July 11, New York: Nan A. Population Growth: —". Archived from the original on September 19, Retrieved November 23, Am 73 3 — March 13, Archived from the original on September 30, Retrieved October 11, A Monetary History of the United States, — Princeton University Press.
December The Journal of Economic History. CiteSeerX JSTOR Roosevelt and the New Deal pp. Franklin Delano Roosevelt: Champion of Freedom. Heinemann, Depression and New Deal in Virginia. May 3, Retrieved December 7, Parker, eds. Routledge Handbook of Modern Economic History. Fishback, Michael R. The numbers come from this U. Census document , p. Note that the graph only covers factory employment. January 1, The FDR Years. Infobase Publishing. New York: PublicAffairs, John T. Woolley and Gerhard Peters. The American Presidency Project. Santa Barbara, Calif. Compiled by Robert B. Matchette, et al. Washington, D. Political Science Quarterly. The Results of a Survey on Forty Propositions". The Economist. December 18, Autumn International Organization.
Retrieved on July 14, The Future of American Politics. Anchor Press. Library of Congress Quarterly Journal , , Vol. Pederson A Companion to Franklin D. Kennedy Oxford University Press. Security Analysis: The Classic Edition. McGraw-Hill Professional, Journal of Contemporary History. Historical Statistics series F1. Journal of Interdisciplinary History. Women at war with America: private lives in a patriotic era.
Harvard University Press. Smith; Lisa A. A History of Child Welfare. Retrieved April 5, Harvard UP. A Study of Administrative Experience. Research Series 3 Eliot, and Lillian R. Encyclopedia of Military Science. SAGE Publications. Explorations in Economic History. New Views of Roosevelt's New Deal. S2CID International Labor and Working-Class History. ISSN Hart The Eisenhower Years. Sharpe, Inc.
Journal of Economic Literature. See also Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr. The Coming of the New Deal, — p. American History After Bureau of the Census. Statistical Abstract of the United States: A new deal for blacks: The emergence of civil rights as a national issue: The depression decade. United States: Oxford University Press. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, , Kindle location Lumpkins American Pogrom: The East St. Louis Race Riot and Black Politics. Ohio UP. Badger Badger Reader. Southern Illinois Press. Ickes Vol. Chappell Klinkner; Rogers M. Smith U of Chicago Press. Journal of Southern History. American Historical Review. Young women were eligible for NYA jobs which began in Friedman Two Lucky People: Memoirs.
Free to Choose. Avon Books. Historical statistics of the United States, colonial times to The Great Contraction, — New ed. Bernanke Nov. The American Economic Review. Bradford, Lawrence H. Summers, N. Gregory Mankiw, and Christina D. Journal of Economic History. Eastern Economic Journal. But declaring that WPA workers were unemployed is just silly". February 2, Retrieved September 11, Journal of Political Economy. Capitalism and Freedom: Fortieth Anniversary Edition.
New York: W. Atlantic Monthly. Ottanelli Rutgers University Press. Buhite and David W. Levy Fdr's Fireside Chats. University of Oklahoma Press. Payne A History of Fascism, — University of Wisconsin Pres. Reviews in American History. Houghton Mifflin. Purcell The Free Press. Bremner, David Brody. Benshoff, Sean Griffin, America on film: representing race, class, gender, and sexuality at the movies pp. The Journal of American History. ABC News. Retrieved March 6, See also: Bibliography of Franklin D. Badger, Anthony J. The New Deal. Dubofsky, Melvyn , ed. Franklin D. Roosevelt and the New Deal, — A standard interpretive history. Jr — , The Age of Roosevelt , the 3-volume classic narrative history. Strongly supports FDR. Arthur M.
A friendly liberal evaluation. Smith, Jason Scott. A Concise History of the New Deal Arrington, Leonard J. Biles, Roger. The South and the New Deal Kelly of Chicago. Blakey, George T. Hard Times and New Deal in Kentucky: — Braeman, John, Robert H. Bremner and David Brody , eds. Christin, Pierre, and Olivier Balez, eds. Ferguson, Karen Jane. Black Politics in New Deal Atlanta Grant, Michael Johnston. Heineman, Kenneth J. Ingalls, Robert P. Herbert H. Leader, Leonard.
Los Angeles and the Great Depression. Lowitt, Richard. The New Deal and the West Malone, Michael P. Pacific Historical Review. I think we all have to do what is best for us - and it takes nothing at all away from your dog's love for you - or my son's dog's love for him. We all just deal with this issue differently. Fuzzy would not want you to feel guilt or dismay - he had a good life with you so please, forgive yourself. There truly is nothing to forgive. You did the right thing by ending his suffering. That is what is important.
If you love him, let him go so to speak, but know he will always, always, always be a part of you no matter how his life ended. Sending virtual hugs. I am so sorry for your loss as well. Question: Do you think getting a new dog has helped or hindered your grieving the loss of Griffin? Answer: I do think that having another dog and even having Gabby Griff's niece has helped me tremendously. It is not that they are replacements by any means - but they just fill the space with their love and their needs I guess. They remind me of who he was and they make me smile in other ways. Again, they cannot fill that special place that Griffin will always occupy but they give me peace and I treasure that. Levi will always be with you - no matter how much time passes, I look at a picture of Griff or a video and I tear up.
I still miss him because he was THAT special. I love the polar bear image - that was my Griff A big old teddy bear polar bear. It is so hard letting go but it is possible to find joy in another dog. It is never quite the same feeling if you love one of them that much, but it is pretty close. I see Griff from time to time especially in Max and that brings me a lot of calm. Question: I have just lost my beautiful dog Blossom who died of a blood sarcoma within 3 weeks of diagnosis. She made me laugh too, she brought so much joy to other people.
She was so sweet, so innocent and so smart too, I swear she could read my mind at times. Thank you for sharing your story and your grief so I can share mine. Answer: I'm so sorry for your loss and I'm also so sorry I did not see this until today! I definitely think dogs can feel what we are thinking. I know mine seem to always know if I'm happy or sad - but Griffin especially 'got' me in a way that no other dog ever has. He was just ethereal so to speak - like an angel in a dog's body. I'm so sorry Blossom left you too soon. I don't think we ever are ready to say goodbye but especially when they mean so much to us. I do know though that I did not want Griff to suffer and that was the only way that I could let him go.
He was in such pain and so quickly that we could not let him suffer. You did the right thing - even though it is the hardest thing we will ever have to do in our lives probably. She knew though and she knew that you were selfless. Try to think of that - she knew how much you loved her and did not want her to go. I think they are still with us - somewhere their spirit lives on and they send us their blessings and their love. You will always be her wonderful master, no matter what happened. Take care and again, I'm so sorry for your grief as well. Question: I lost my dog Max last month.
He was nine years and 4 months and suffered from kidney failure. I did everything possible for me to add quality to his last months and days. He passed away at home in my arms. I seem to lose hope every day. I'm sinking further in grief. Why do I feel guilty if I even think to move on? Answer: I think is it very rare to get over a tragedy so quickly, so I think that your grief is completely normal. I lost Griffin in and it is now I still miss him and still feel guilty at some odd times because I wonder if I did everything I could have done for him. I know I did, but then doubt or sadness start to creep back into my mind. I also felt very guilty about getting a new dog - our Max.
However, I know it was the right thing to do because my dog that remained was heartbroken. It was just the right thing to do for her, but it also turned out to be the best thing for us as well. Having someone else to channel all that love into really did help us get over our grief of losing our most precious dog. I think as long as we try and help our pets, we will always be okay in the end.
It just takes time. There is no meter running on how long someone grieves for a pet - or for a person. We just try and own up to it, feel it, acknowledge it, but then try and move on to a plateau of sorts I think. What a wonderful and precious gift I had in him. You had that in Max and you felt it to be so good to him when he needed you most. Most importantly - HE knew that and knew that you loved him. We have to give ourselves a bit of grace and let ourselves off the hook. Given the circumstances, we could not change them for our guys and we did the very best we could. I wish you peace and sending you virtual hope that you will find an ease in your grief over time. It will always be there - my love and missing Griffin is always with me - but I can now see how blessed I was to have had him in my life.
For that, I guess the pain of losing him was "worth" it. I wish I had not but in reality, I would never have been ready for him to go because I loved him that much. Be grateful for your Max time - I know you are and will always be. He will come again to you in other ways! Question: Your Griff story is much like mine. I am so sorry for your loss. Can't stop crying and people think I am a fool. Although I had both my dogs for twelve years, the last two i had to lift them up so they could do their business.
Letting go of my baby girl two days before Thanksgiving was the worst thing and I regret the day I did it. I wont get another dog for some time, but is there a way to become more open to accepting a dog in the future? I am so heartbroken i cannot function. Answer: I am SO sorry for your loss. I did not see this until today! What a terrible thing to lose your best friend before a holiday. It doesn't really matter how old they are - if they have forged a bond in your heart for some reason more than other dogs, it is like cutting part of yourself off.
I'm so sorry and yes, it does take time and eventually you can love again. I love Max a tremendous amount now thinking I never would be able to - and that kind of scares me too as I don't want to lose him either! I don't think it is the overwhelming love that I felt for Griff but it definitely is there - even though he is a wicked boy!!! Thinking of you and wishing you peace. It will get better with time. Question: I too just lost my dog and had not realized he was my therapy dog. Put him to sleep due to bladder stones. He was only twelve. I miss him so so much. How can I come to terms about him passing away? Answer: There is no magic time table about coming to terms with such a loss, and I am so very sorry for your loss.
Whether they are 20 years old or 20 months old, if they are special to you and fill something inside of you, it doesn't matter It is just a horrific loss. It is one of the things in life I've found that just takes a lot of time. Some of my dogs more than others, but as I wrote about Griff, he was extra special. Something in him just made it unbearable to lose him.
He definitely was my therapy dog and like you, I did not realize I had one or needed one. I can only say that the pain lessens in time and the reality of them not suffering anymore takes over. I would never have wanted him to suffer at all and he was suffering horribly in such a short period of time. I could not do that to him and that was how I made my decision with my husband and we could see no other way forward. However, it left a huge hole in our lives and in our hearts - it is still there.
Every day, it does get a little easier. I could not be bitter over it simply because I was given SUCH a gift and I had him in my life which meant the world to me. I have come to the conclusion that he was just meant to be for that period of time and to teach me many things, unfortunately, grief among them. Since I lost him, I lost both my parents so I suppose in some way, I was able to understand the grieving process more simply because I was so struck by losing Griffin.
I would also say that all the stages are normal - it has taken me since to even process losing him. I still miss him - and that is a blessing and a curse all in one. Again, because I had him, I cannot remain sad too long though and have to just remind myself how very blessed I was to have had him at all in my life. Having Gabby and now Max has helped as well. I cannot imagine if he had been my only dog. I think that is how I have coped over the years with losing dogs - I have always had other dogs and somehow caring for them has eased the pain a bit. The same has happened with Max and Gabby. There is NO replacement in the world for Griffin but they do make me laugh and sometimes I even see my Griffin coming through in either one of them, especially Max.
It is as if he is trying to nudge me and say I'm still here, mom. Sending you virtual hugs and hope that you will find peace with your tough, tough decision. Know that he would not have wanted to suffer and loved you always most of all. It is a gift that we give them in letting them go but it is such a hard, hard decision. Take care. Be well. Question: I lost my dog a year ago and I am trying to cope with it. I am struggling. I am not happy. I am always down. When I am at school, I can't focus on my work and sometimes I just break down. Every time I see her on my phone I start crying. I am so sad and when I was going though a hard time she used to always be there. I know it sounds weird, but I talked to her and I hugged her at the end.
I just felt better but I don't have her with me now, so what do I do? Answer: I'm so sorry for your loss. I know how we come to depend on our special therapy dogs to help us heal and when they are gone, it feels like there is a huge void where they were. I would just try and tell myself that it is normal to grieve when you have suffered such a tremendous loss and then try and think of ways that you can not 'replace' her when you get stressed but ways that you can cope better with anxiety.
That may or may not involve getting another dog. Sometimes, people are so lonesome for who they lost that they cannot fathom getting another dog and others seem to be able to transfer that grief into starting over with a new pet. It is never the same when you have lost your favorite but it can bring peace and ease your suffering. There are also support groups for grieving pet owners, and that might be a good alternative as well. Wishing you peace in your struggles. I totally understand and am so sorry for your loss. Question: I lost my dog five years ago and I still haven't been able to have another dog.
I love dogs and I feel the need to have another one but every time I think asking my parents for a new one the fear of losing it too gets me and I prefer to not have one. I still sometimes dream about her or forget that she's no longer with us and wait for her. I've never thought I'm not over her death but today I just couldn't not cry. Is this common after all these years? Answer: Grief never has a time table and I am so sorry for your loss. I'm also sorry I did not see this question until today!
I think that grief hits us all a bit differently. Some of it takes us surprise as well. I can look at a picture of Griff who died in and still start to cry for missing him. I think it is a normal response to never want to go through that pain again and some people actually will themselves to feel that way. They do not want to experience the pain of losing another pet or something they love so much. That is a normal response. It becomes a personal decision. I know myself that I've been grateful for the distraction - for having another dog to pour my energy into to not replace Griffin but to somehow divert my grief into something positive.
I know he would want me to be happy and not miss him terribly so that is how I self-talk myself into it I guess. It is rewarding to have another dog and see how they respond to your love and attention. It cannot replace the one you lost but it is rewarding and heartwarming nonetheless. Good luck in your journey and I am very sorry for your loss. Thank you so much for sharing your story about Whiskey - what a great name! I am so glad you all had that time with him. Ironically, Griffin died 5 years ago yesterday and I was recalling how awful that day was and how I felt. It is just the hardest thing to do in the world, but the best thing we can do for them when they are suffering.
I do still miss him terribly just because he was THAT special. I have been able to move on and love Max and of course Gabby without fail but there will always just be a spot where Griffin will always be that one in a million. He just went too soon for my heart to accept but life is just life sometimes. I wish you all peace and gratefulness for the time you had together. He sounds like my Griff in many ways. Let's hope and pray that Whiskey and Griffin are romping somewhere free of pain and distress - or perhaps they have come back to be someone else's angels, for I truly believe that.
Hugs to you all from afar. My parents and I just put our beloved golden retriever, Whiskey, to sleep this morning. He was our first dog, but very, very quickly I realized how special he was. His gentleness, his understanding, his special individual bond with each of us and his ability to just draw people to him out of love and joy. I kept telling my folks, we won't see another one like him in our lifetimes, he's one in a million. I don't know why i'm writing this, i just flew in amidst the pandemic and was lucky enough to spend his last 4 days with him.
I've been working overseas for 6 years, but came home to be with him every 2. To be honest, hearing that you cry for Griffin even after two years, terrifies me, not just for myself but more for my folks. Their lives truly revolved around him and his routine and i'm just praying to god that we continue to find happiness in our lives without him around us. Whiskey lived a full and happy life and was arguably the most loved dog in the world. There's a part of me that hopes someone else could help fill that void, yet there's another part of me knows this connection was too special to happen again. And I don't know how to deal with that. Thank you for sharing your post. I did not have the courage to read large parts of it, especially parts about what led to griffin's health deterioration.
I must have a million pictures of whisk on different phone's and devices, I feel I should compile to help us in our grieving process but I can't muster the strength to look at his picture. Oh Jamie - I am SO sorry for your loss. I do not think there could be anything more painful that having someone be responsible for killing our pet. I know it will not help but I would report it to whoever did it - meaning the company. Your pain is real.
I do not think that feeling all of those feelings are unusual when something that traumatic and devastating happens to you. I cannot imagine losing one of my dogs like that. Any way we lose them is heartbreaking but that seems so senseless and so unfair. I'm so very sorry for your loss. You will learn to live with it for sure - we always seem to - but something that is traumatic can bother you for a very long time.
It is part of the process of dealing with something that is just unspeakably cruel or jarring to our very soul. Please know I'm thinking of you and sending you virtual hugs. I totally understand the depth of your sadness and your loss. Just know that Molly loved YOU beyond the moon and back. She would not have wanted to go and she will always, always be with you in your heart. She will come back to you somehow and let you know she is still there. I truly believe that.
They are gone but never, ever forgotten. Again, I am so sorry for your tragedy today. It makes my heart and my chest hurt and makes me cry for your loss. Take care and know you have a group of people who know your loss and are there with you in spirit. I had a Molly too - god love her and may she also rest in peace. Somebody opened our garden gate this morning and didn't close it. This resulted in my beloved Molly running out into the nearby road and being killed by a vehicle. There aren't a set of words to describe the devastation that I feel right now.
I work from home and she's always by my side or on my feet. I keep having waves of complete meltdowns bursting into tears and my chest physically hurts. I have this overwhelming dread that I may never get over this. At the very least it's going to take a very long time. I kinda know that there isn't a magic answer and only time can ease this pain. But here I am anyway writing this down because it's somewhat of a relief. That is SO heartbreaking. Five years old is just not 'fair' as Griffin's loss at 6 years old was not fair either. Your pain is normal and your crying appropriate. I can say that it gets easier with time but that really is very little comfort when you are missing your very best buddy.
Benson is a darling name. I can only say that the thing that tipped the scales for us was his pain. He all of a sudden had this terrible disease that we just did not see. We could absolutely not bear to see him suffer and I think you must have felt the same. It is the hardest decision in the world to make, but do take comfort in the fact that you loved him with ALL of your heart and did not want him to suffer. I figure they are running free now in a world with no pain and no suffering. That is the ultimate gift we can give these extra special, wonderful angels that appear as dogs to us. I'm sending you thoughts of peace and serenity for Benson knowing that you did do the right thing to end his suffering.
He will always be a part of you and will always have that huge place in your heart. Take care and know I'm thinking of you. Again, I'm so sorry for your tragic loss. I had to have my 5 yr old Shih tzu put down today for cancer. I am beyond devastated. He was my everything. I have 2 other Shih Tzus but benson was my everything. I am having a very bad time. I'm so sorry for your loss of your baby Bruno. I know from losing Molly at 14 years old, it was just not enough time with her. She was one of my all-time favorites. I hear everything you are saying and it is all quite normal because it is just too raw and too new.
They are there in one minute and gone in an instant and it just seems unbelievable, the heartache unbearable, and everything reminds us of them. He was my hardest to get over and I still think of him when I touch certain things, see certain things, go certain places. He is just a part of me that will never go away. That is a blessing mostly but a curse sometimes as well. Our hearts DO have an incredible ability to heal though so I encourage you to let your heart be open to that. No matter how you decide to honor Bruno, he will always be a part of you. I think donating or championing animals is a fabulous idea.
Of course, I also believe that taking on another pet to love is a great idea. I seriously thought the past few times that I simply could never do it again. I did not want to go through the pain ever again. Then, when I decided to just 'do it' for whatever reason the latest acquisition of Max truly I thought was for Gabby because she would have died of loneliness , I found that my heart could open up again and love another dog.
I would not say that my love of Max or Gabby is the same as how I loved Griffin, but it really doesn't matter in the long run. They are happy and I saved Gabby - which is the best possible thing. I do adore Max and see a lot of my Griffin there from time to time - it is like he is winking at me or smiling and saying "I'm still here, mom, don't be sad. They cannot replace one we have loved, but they do fill a void somehow. We just have to be willing to let them do it in their own way. I gave up early on trying to mold Max into a Griffin!!! It just was not possible. I love him for who he is and Gabby for who she is. I don't think there is much more comfort that you can get than with dogs or pets.
Especially during this COVID thing and going through lately my husband's cancer treatment, the dogs have brought me comfort in ways I never expected. I wish you every good thing, peace most of all. You loved Bruno and did the very, very best that you could by him. That being said though, I'm so very sorry for your loss because I know how painful that is. It hopefully will get better with time - but don't give up on loving again. It is possible - it is worthwhile because we give a dog someone who loves them and takes care of them and that can never be a bad thing.
Sending virtual hugs to you. I had a handsome canine named bruno who was with 14 years old 2 days ago. He had a tumor on his thigh and it was too late for any op to be conducted. We were forced to put down our baby who was older than my first born which felt like my eldest child was leaving for good. A painful process indeed as we all still mourning and im finding it extremely hard. However the pain is aweful thinking he could be laying next to me and not where he is right now. Im now considering adopting from the SPCA and even help raising funds for animal shelters in his name. That is my daughter's name! I feel so badly for you.
Three days after I lost Griff I was a basket case. So was my husband. We just loved that crazy dog so much so I totally feel your pain. I think it was the hardest thing I ever had to do in my life and I had had a lot of hard things to cope with. I had also had a lot of dogs that I loved and lost but truly, that 'one' heart breaker that we fall for - worth it but so very hard. I'm so sorry for your loss and just know that it will get better with time - though I will always cry when I think of Griff and losing him.
I think of him at the oddest times or think how quickly it all went by - the blink of an eye really. However, the most glaring thing of all of it that jumps out at me every time I feel sad is that I was just so happy to have him. I am still happy to have had him. It was a privilege. It was the best of times for sure and I would not trade that in spite of the pain it caused when he had to leave.
I think of him and hope and pray I get to meet up with him again one day. He will be SO happy and I will be over the moon! Until then, I just have to be content to remember the many, many good times and the times he comes to visit me in my dreams. I'm wishing you peace as well. Thank you again for visiting and take care of yourself. I'm so sorry you lost your little girl.
She knew how much you loved her. Thank you so much for this story. I am going through a very similar situation and lost my baby girl 3 days ago. I just know in my heart and brain I will never get over how truly special she was. We were like soulmates - I just know no one will ever love me as much as she did and vice versa. I completely hear your pain and I don't think you ever do truly get over it. I'm all these many years out Griff died in and I still remember how acute that pain was - as well as the pain I have every day in still missing him. Even though I have my other dogs, there is always a part of me that will treasure every moment that I had with him and wish that he was still here.
I had counted on 14 years - why I have no idea - but I was just not ready to let him go - no matter how old he would have been. Thank you for doing the right thing for Marley though. That is the hardest part of all - knowing that we cannot let them suffer. I go over in my head still what I could have done to prevent Griff's death or his diagnosis or his suffering. There just truly is not a good answer and I know that in my head but in my heart, not so much.
It just means that you loved him. That is what I try and remind myself of. Hugs to you and so sorry for your loss. No matter what age, what circumstance, when we love them that much, it is just the worst pain ever losing them. Thank you for sharing your story. I lost my Marley 8 months ago and still breakdown often over it. I loved him as much as any person in my life. I will never forget him, but I do selfishly wish the pain could go away. My heart goes out to everyone who feels this way.
The only solace I can find is that he did not suffer - that was my one promise to him during his last few years and I kept it. Thanks for the observation. I'm sure there is a chemical reaction for sure and many of us experience it with pets as well as our children. You have a great point as well. Most of my dogs 15 total I think thus far have been rescues and they were all so precious. Keep up the fine work and great opinions. Be safe! It is actually a chemical called oxytocin that creates this strong bond between humans and dogs.
I can identify myself with it a lot. All the best. There is so many heartbroken dogs at shelters who are waiting for someone to give them a second chance. My life mission is to rescue dogs that are least likely to be adopted.. I totally understand what you are saying. So many feelings go through us when we lose our favorite pets. You did have him for a long, long time and that is so awesome. He truly 'saw' you and you saw him for all he was and more. He knew how much you loved him and will always be there in your heart.
I do know when we cannot go and say things to them or if we do not have a physical 'marker' of where they are, it can be difficult and we wish in our hearts that we did. I think it is just so hard to grieve our losses and we want to overthink it. In reality, it always ends up the way it is supposed to end up and we have to deal with it the best ways that we can. I think you are well on your way to healing and I have a feeling that another best bud will be finding you very, very soon. I feel like when we have lost one, another one gets a message from the one we just lost to come find us and heal us.
Sending you virtual hugs and wishing you healing even further. You did a great job of being there for him! Past 2 weeks have this hard heavy blocked feeling in my chest can't eat much and I am very full. Now I am starting to feel pain - thought I could suppress the heartbreak thought I was doing OK when i didn't feel constant ache and pain. You see we became best mates he was abandoned by 3 different families in our block before I met him so I learned and one day I was mourning the loss of my other beloved feline soul mate of 23 yrs when this kitty came up to me while I was sitting down outside.
His bold, inquisitive, wild character with a little wild streak like, "Hello m--ee--oo--ww, I see your sad, I'm lonely too, would you like to be friends? I replied softly, "Hello, pleased to meet you, where did you come from then, I'm sorry, but I know you sense I am very sad right now, but I'd love to have your company, would you like to stay"? Circumstances couldn't allow me to keep him in my place so few people in the neighbourhood took turns in TLC for him.
Years went past with a lot of exciting chapters in between our love bond grew stronger and stronger day by day even some neighbours after years of knowing him were not game to pick him up for a cuddle or else they would feel his teeth and claws and were amazed at how he would run to me, literally talk to me in cat tones and allow me to hug, massage and kiss him all over his body. During the past few years his hearing wasn't as acute so sometimes he'd be slower so I called and called looking everywhere for him - no answer.
I thought it was a little odd but not unusual. Then the next couple of days I called and called again - no answer. I checked his water bowl - sigh of relief as I saw it full. I thought where is he? I thought he must be eating lunch somewhere? I have some lunch-, she shook her head and said, he's gone, I said, "oh, where, is he next door"? She replied; "He was very sick and had to go to the vets where we put him to sleep he had bone cancer, I'm sorry". My hands felt weak, I felt a shock of disbelief, with thoughts racing questioning my rationals, I dropped my kitty's lunch and fell to my knees cried out I don't understand, what,, why, what happened"? She came over and hugged me helping me stand as I cried asking why. She said cancer made him sick and there was nothing we could do so we put him to sleep and held his paw throughout it all..
I asked where is he so I can visit him she replied the other neighbour left him at the vets. This is where I felt immense resentment and anger, the frustration at the selfishness of not bringing my beloved back to his home honouring him respect burying him in his little favourite back yard, peacefully and sacredly. Just treated his body with disrespect leaving him behind - I won't say what happens to pets here when they are left at vets it's too distressing I felt angry and betrayed at them for not letting me know when I was calling him for 2 days.
Not only did they take my kitty beloved away but I lost my last chance to say goodbye to him to hold him and whisper in his ears like I did everytime our special words. I was calling and searching on Wednesday and Friday and he was euthanized on Monday. I felt a betrayal of trust from the person who I know had him on her lounge few days before she took him to the vets he would have heard me calling him from the window in the back yard.
But I know I have to forgive her for she was probably doing the best she could in her way for my beloved kitty. So I forgave her for that - but I cannot visit his resting place because he has none I feel lost and anxious about this. Like a child running here and there looking for her parent when lost. I felt deep sadness and loss and short-term pain. But the pain only lasted a few hours and I felt guilty that I didn't feel it after the tears - what happened?
I was sad, angry, irritable and all that goes with it over past 2 weeks but was also confused and disappointed in myself for not feeling the pain, that I had gotten over the pain so quickly within a day! Now as I write this I understand why I have had sudden indigestion, the lump in my chest and the heavy discomfort block. So as I write this my realisation comes forward and to release my heartbreak pain as it is coming to surface today. I remember decades ago when my beloved 10 yr old Budgie passed away the same physical experience occurred and yes I still miss her and love her deeply eternally. I just want you to know and understand that we shouldn't expect to feel heartache immediately because sometimes we just can't take it in we can only allow the feelings to be felt when we are ready to feel them, putting it more metaphysically, when we can handle them regardless of the pain.
Our soul recognises when we can learn to experience and deal with these feelings. So if you're reading this and you feel a loss as to why you're not feeling it just accept it that it's ok and you will when you can stomach the loss to occur. I hope this helps some pet parents. I am SO sorry - that must have been extremely traumatic and devastating for everyone. I think that the best way to remember your dog is to allow yourself to cry when you need to. Everyone has to grieve in their own way. The ways that I get out of my anxiety over losing Griff might not be the same ones that work for you - but here are some suggestions.
I try and remember every good moment that I had with him and that makes me smile, not cry. I try and focus on that instead of the pain I feel in losing him too soon. I look at his pictures, watch videos of him, and even have made greeting cards that I give to other people and have canvases that I had made of him to remind me how he is still part of my life and my heart. Those things make me feel better and soothe me. I also put pictures of him on my phone - on my computer - so that I see him often and can give a little nod of remembrance. Even my picture here is me holding him when he was a puppy - a very big puppy!
I hope that helps and I am so very sorry for your tragic loss. Sometimes it just takes more time for us to heal our wound over losing our dog, but especially if it was a traumatic event. Sending virtual hugs - be safe! My dog got shot sadly and my family really miss her she has been gone for 8 months and I still cry when I think about her she was my best friend so it would be helpful if you could give me some examples on how to not cry when you think about her or him. You are most welcome, KJ but so sorry we have to be part of that special club - losing the canine love of our life. It is so very hard. Looking back on it, I do think that it prepared me for other losses I was to endure - or at least that is what I have told myself.
I hope to be together with my Griff one day again as he truly was one of a kind. I'm sure Rigby was too. Thank you. I needed some input from someone who has had that kind of relationship and loss. I appreciate that. Strangely, I know exactly what you are talking about! I had Griff's leash and even though we moved to another house completely after we lost him, I hung up his leash - like he was still here. I didn't want to use the leash - I just wanted it hanging there to remind me of him forever. Then one day, I just took it off the hook and used it on Max. It became Max's leash thereafter.
The funny thing is, it didn't change how I felt about Griff or about Max. I kept his dog tags, I kept his collar. I kept other things that were his, and those I've never used. They just sit in my drawer in my hutch and I see them from time to time and think of him. It is funny the things that make us think about them or worry about are we trying to replace them. I don't think that it is that at all though now that it has been some time. Seven months is still pretty raw from your loss, so I think in time, you'll feel better about it. It is just something that we associate with them and it hurts us to think of getting rid of it or using it with another pet.
I totally get what you mean too about waiting too long. I'm sure Penny will adapt - we actually brought Griffin home when Denaya was I want to say 12 or 13? I was really worried because they were malamutes but she just went huh - a new guy in town! She was wonderful with him and actually taught him to be who he needed to be. The same with Gabby - she was even older by then and I was really kind of worried about it but wanted Griff to have a younger dog to grow up with. It all worked out the way it was supposed to. I'd almost say that you should leave Rigby's leash - just as a memory.
It's okay that we remember them. We have enough room in our hearts to love a bunch of dogs - maybe not QUITE the same as that special one - but it never hurts to have a remembrance. I have gotten Max his own leash now. I don't even know why I used Griff's but I just wanted to for some reason. Maybe I was trying to get my own head around he was gone and I needed to devote more time to Max. I have no idea. His leash still hangs there to this day though. It's like he's just in the other room maybe and he will need to go for a walk someday.
I probably will do the same with Gabby's - and then Max's. Or I will keep something of theirs out though I have so many pics of them - small and large canvases - interspersed with family - I can never truly forget any of them. I do know how awful that is when you are so bound to a special dog. It does get better in time but I will always, always, always have a hole where Griffin is not there anymore. I am thankful for Gabby and Max as they make me laugh every day and make me feel the love though and am grateful for every moment I get to spend with them too.
Take care, be safe - and your heart will tell you when it's time to think about another pup. Your piece resonated with me so much. If a dog can be your soulmate, Rigby was mine. My husband said that it was like we were one being. She is the sweetest dog and her being with us helped tremendously after Rigby died. Like your Gabby, she mourned her sister, but she has been able to adjust and be the only dog. I keep telling myself that we would not be replacing Rigby and that I would end up loving a new puppy, which I would. Ah David - you cannot possibly mess up my thread! I started to cry because I know the agony of what you went through.
We were hoping and praying that Griff just had a strained ligament. It made no sense. When they went to x-ray it, they broke his leg and that is exactly what must have happened to your Beau. The cancer was there already and had weakened the bone and from that moment on, Griffin was just in horrible pain. He was not a giant and weighed only about but they wanted us to amputate his leg.
I couldn't bear it. He said that the cancer had already most likely spread which probably was true of Beau too in my humble opinion. It would have prolonged his life, yes - but to have him suffer even more - we both could not bear it. I am so glad I wrote this as it did help me then and continues to help me as I connect with so many people who have grieving hearts just like mine. I don't think there has been anything in my life that made such an impact on me simply because I didn't see it coming. However, it taught me many things and did prepare me for grief to come, such as losing my stepfather and then my mom a few years later, I guess.
That is what I tell myself anyway. However, I would have to say that I still cry over losing him. I don't know why - he was just that special to me. He will always be with me and always be in my heart but man - I surely miss him and all the good times we had. I am so sorry for YOUR loss too - and know that with time, it can get better though I don't think the grief ever goes completely away. It seems so unfair for them to die that particular way - but then is life ever 'fair' - that is the question. We must go on and accept what we must accept I guess. Sending you virtual hugs in this time of social distancing but I do know your pain all too well. Be well and know that you did the right thing for Beau.
I believe it to my bones that Griffin would not have wanted me to let him suffer and that brings me peace. I am still SO grateful for every moment I had with that special boy and I'm sure you feel the same - despite the sadness in saying that final goodbye. Take care!! We did water therapy there times a week all ready so we knew he was trying to rehab from a torn knee ligament and know we know what else.
He would never give up. I was in shock. The doctor immediately gave him a pain shot and we took him immediately to an emergency vet that is an excellent and talented vet. Come to find out a short 3 hours later, he had bone cancer and it broke his leg. We had to make the decision right there, they said due to his size an amputation would only prolong his situation, we had to let him go. I still cry to this very day he was my special boy a giant Malamute as a gentle giant. I also need to thank God that he directed me to your site! Just a few moments ago today as my wife of 30 years talked in the other room I began to cry because I miss him so much. I had to find another dog story to help me through and God led me here. Thanks for reaching out to me.
Yes, the people in our lives who do understand and help us through this are invaluable. My grandson who probably met Griff when he was only a year old and doesn't really remember him talks about Griff from the pictures I have of him. It is nice to keep him alive in our hearts. I love the Welsh word for hug! Take care and thanks again for sharing your kind words. I had a Mollie also - Molly, my beautiful black lab - and she will always be in my heart as well. Hi Audrey, I wrote to you about fifteen months ago, after I lost my darling Mollie. It is still unbearable without her, my grief is still ongoing and truly debilitating. I'm so very lucky to have my wonderful husband of 43 years our sons and beautiful grandchildren.
They understand what I'm going through, as I know you are going through the same after losing your beautiful boy Griffin. Hope all is well with you Audrey, we are so fortunate to have had Griffin and Mollie in our lives, kind regards and cwtches cwtch is the Welsh word for hug x. I totally understand that feeling also, John. My mom felt the same way about her Ozko who lived to be What a great long life you got with your little boy! I am sorry for your loss and it does reiterate the fact that some of these dogs are just too special to forget. I saw a pic today which is unique as Griff was really 'one of a kind' in his look of a dog that looks so much like him it took my breath away and gave me a few tears.
I think remembering them is a good thing though and wishing you peace with your memories. My Yeah just a slight connection. For me, I will never get another dog as he was my guy. I know everyone says he'd want you to be happy and love another dog again, blah blah. But not for me, if I ever was married and my wife passed, I would never marry again. She was my gal and Im loyal to her and couldn't ever have someone take her place. I think it is good if others do get another dog as we all are different.
I am so sorry Viryabo. I kind of suspect that I will always cry over Griffin and some of my other 'favorites' though I have loved them all for so long. I'm so sorry for your loss and especially with 2 of them in a couple of weeks. We lost Denaya and Griffin within about 4 or 5 months of each other though Denaya was very old so it was not a 'shock' but still a terrific loss. Losing Griff was just catastrophic for us both and then to poor Gabby. I wish you peace and so sorry for your loss. Thank you for sharing your story with me. I lost my loving pets, both within a couple of weeks.Number of children crossing Darien Did The New Deal Prolong The Great Depression hits record high The number of minors who risked their lives to Understanding Informed Consent the inhospitable stretch of land that Did The New Deal Prolong The Great Depression Colombia and Panama has Did The New Deal Prolong The Great Depression a record high. Some of my dogs more than others, but as I wrote Gun Control Case Study Griff, he was extra special. Lewis